Hire Smart & Grow a Successful Team | Lou Adler | On The Homefront

Brief Summary
In this episode of The Homefront, Jeff Dudan sits down with Lou Adler, renowned recruiting strategist, best-selling author, and creator of the Performance-Based Hiring system. They unpack decades of wisdom on hiring the right talent, avoiding bias, and building long-term success by focusing on what truly matters—real performance in real-world environments. From corporate politics to recruiting philosophy, Lou shares bold truths and practical tools that will shift how you think about talent forever.
Key Takeaways
- Hire for performance, not personality. The best predictor of future success is evidence of relevant accomplishments in comparable environments—not interview skills or charisma.
- Define the job as outcomes, not qualifications. Avoid skills-based job descriptions and focus on key results and performance objectives.
- Bias is the biggest hiring mistake. First impressions distort decisions. Structure your interviews and delay judgment for at least 30 minutes.
- Assessment tools confirm, not predict. Use tools like Predictive Index at the end—not the start—of the hiring process to validate strong candidates.
- Team skills are proven through history. Look for patterns in how candidates have been repeatedly invited into and succeeded on diverse teams.
- Think long-term: Hire for the anniversary date, not the start date. Don’t make strategic hiring decisions based on tactical factors like comp or convenience.
FEATURED QUOTE
“Don’t make long-term career decisions using short-term data.”
TRANSCRIPT
From Plant Manager to Performance Hiring Pioneer: Lou Adler’s Career Journey
lou_adler (01:22.02)
jeff thank you very much for inviting me i look forward to chatting with you today
lou_adler (02:07.06)
well the journey actually is a weird journey because i didn't hope to become a recruiter ever thought of doing that when i was quite young thirty thirty two years old i was running a manufacturing company hated my group resident he and i argued and he actually hired me for that job but i didn't like him and i was a young kid and yelled and screamed at each other every time he showed up every other week so i started using recruiters at the time and after about six months to a year i said you know
i think i can't deal with this i'm going to look for another job but maybe i'll start with the recruiter they started telling he wanted to do that and it sounded pretty interesting i gave my notice and it was a six month notice so it was not and they tried to bring me back and gave me the track but i didn't want to work with that guy so that really was the catalyst for leaving but as soon as i became a recruiter i realized that hiring was screwed up and this is nineteen seventy eight screwed up managers did know what they're looking for candidates to know what they wanted cloth
it was a superficial and simple area how we found candidates was kind of hodge podge and it's still kind of screwed up forty five years later but i realized hiring could be a business process if you followed a certain set of rules and that's what became performance based hiring a sequence of steps that you follow each and every time and if you do that you'll actually will hire excellent people but it starts with how find work but that's the short take on it i just quit and i've sometimes thought that was a dumb decision
do but at seventy six it might still have been a dumb decision but it was a decision i made forty five years ago so it's kind of too late to do anything about it but that's kind of the journey how i got there which is kind of a weird journey but that's so be it that's what it was
Leaving a 300-Person Team for a Cubicle: Betting on Yourself in Recruiting
lou_adler (04:11.74)
that's good jeff that's a real good question from your audience point of view i started using so i was running the manufacturing company three hundred people on thirty years old so i was on a good track um and i knew that i could continue it i did not like the corporate politics there was a lot of bsgoes and i didn't like the group president be other people i really like to executives but there's still a lot of corporate politic and said i don't need this so i knew as a recruiter this
one guy that i was working with whom my wife met because i was their biggest client he just lived in his palatial mansion palatial mansion uh and my wife says hey why not you become a recruiter is my wife was telling me this and so she supported a decision to leave in december of nineteen seventy seven i walked from the corner office with a company of three hundred people reporting to me to this little cup of cubical and i was a recruiter on my own and i kind of want to stoop
decision at so i actually did but i knew i had planned six months of income that i could pull it off and but right away i got into it i really know i can actually do this and there was a thing that can appisode i change the process so yes i was fearful the first six months i thought it was going to fail my wife totally supported the decision and i've been married i met her in nineteen sixty and were still married so she supported one hundred percent i had a little four year old son at the time and never saw him
so there's a lot of things that went on that i said you know i got to do this so when i looked back in retrospect at it forty plus years later it was the right decision because it gave me a different kind of life being my own boss not dealing with the corporate politics and that person in particular even if i got rid of that person which that was an option they said he will give you another division at a different place where he is not the group president i still had to deal with the corporate so i said no i can't do it that's but so but i was self confident enough to know
that i could find something else if this didn't work out as running a manufacturing company at thirty two three hundred people i could find another job it wasn't what i wanted to do but i knew that was always an option so i took a risk and i had my wife's supports and it worked out real well
lou_adler (06:30.86)
right
Why Competency-Based Hiring Falls Short Without Job Context
lou_adler (08:13.68)
well let me kind of go through the point so let me kind of discredit competency based hiring just in general when i'll give you a start everybody has certain set of competencies results are good team skills intelligent problem solver but without the context of the job it's kind of meaningless so i always say okay what's the most important competency you want results are in god ay what does i always ask what does that look like on the job what does that competency look like on the job
oh they got to deal with these kind of people a complish these kinds of tasks fine i'll find people who are competent and motivated to do that but if you just make this generic competence s the likelihood that they'll fit with that specific environment in your situation is remote so that's why i don't like generic competence it's got to be related to the content of the job in the actual work itself i am very resultsoriant in a certain situation i love the job running this manufacturing facility with three hundred people i did not like the job when that group president came down
and complained and said he should do it his way and so i'm not doing it your way fire me you don't like my way but just leave me alone so he demotivated me so even was perfectly competent to do that at that point in time i was de motivated for forty eight hours when he left for two weeks i was fine and then he came back and i was motivated again so i think there's certain situations of that put people despite their competency to be unsuccessful if you're a jerk as a hiring manager well you better hire someone you can deal with jerks now
someone who's competent to motivate to do it i mean that's just the reality of it so now let me give you a story of the whole performance based hiring process so this happened and probably i'm goin to say nineteen ninety five as a recruiter then i had the good fortune of being introduced a number of different business groups that i could present my methodology for hiring i didn't call it performance based hiring at that time but that's what it was so i remember i gave a presentation to a
up of mid sized company presidents and these were companies five million to fifty million say and a couple of weeks later and it was great because i would get in front of them and tell them how to do this so a couple of weeks later i get a call from one of the people present of a company that made wood products i don't exactly remember what the wood products were but he calls me said lou at the presentation what were the two questions you said you must ask the candidates before you hire anybody and i said well it doesn't really mat
The Two Questions That Can Transform Your Interviews (With a Walkthrough)
lou_adler (10:43.6)
what the two questions are i got to know the job i just let's just tell me about the job as i don't have time just tell me the two questions and he was getting really acgrvate just tell me the two questions that i can't just they're meaningless without knowing what you're looking for i said why are you so insistent on the two questions and he said the candidates in the hall way i said ah that's a different issue i said so here's what i want you to do i want you to walk through your manufacturing facility and it was making wood products i want you to walk through the facility
and when you get to a specific problem in that he was looking for v p operations to run it and probably a ten or twelve million dollar company hundred hundred twenty people i said i want you to stop at every cation i said so so i said tell me one of the problems he said the way we lay out raw material was terrible i said fine hen you get to the area of raw material stacked up and mislaid and poorly documented i want you to stop and ask the candidate these two questions the first question is if you were to get this job how would you solve this
problem and spend five minutes eight minutes on getting his thoughts about it but more important ask this question next if you were to get this job or how have we have you ever solved a problem similar to that tell me all about it and spend another ten eight to ten minutes on the answer that solution then do that for three or four other big problems you have how would you solved the problem what haf you accomplish its most related spend twenty minutes in each of those areas and then call me when you're done so this is kind of i think it was ten
clock in the morning uh he calls me about two o'clock he said done we walked through at two hours candidate was great at telling me how we do it but he wasn't very good at doing anything similar so i perceive him to be a good consulting type but not an hands on operational guy wanted to come out and i'll give you a search for the v p operations but so the three things that you got to know the job you got to ask candidates what are they accomplished related to those performance objectives of the job and how would they
solve the problem if they get it that's performance based in defined the job as a series of performance objectives not a list of skills competencies and academics it's what people do with what they have that makes some successful so focus on what they have you think you need a result joined competency well it's got to be results or to solve the problem you got not result or an to solve different problems this guy was definitely results orient the consultant guy but he wasn't hands on guy to solve that specific problem in that set in that environment so i think it's tying
lou_adler (13:13.52)
skills and competencies to the real needs and the context of the job that's performance based hire
Assessment Tests: Confirming vs. Predicting Talent
lou_adler (13:35.06)
let me i got to tell another now i got to tell another story that one of the big dominant assessment test twenty years ago was profiles international gave a detailed i q test and a personality test which is very similar predictive index jim sur basket was the present of the company he said lou if you say something nice about my assessment in the second edition of hio with your head i will have each of my reps and he had six hundred or eight hundred reps by three copies and
that a copy of that book to our customers that was a pretty good deal just to give you a sense i won't tell you what i said about it in the book it was semi positive when the book came out it was number one amazon best seller and it's not because it was a great book because i made the deal with jymserbasket the present profiles international what i put in the book was assessment test for the final three candidates are perfect but don't use it to screen out it's a confirming indicator not predict
indicator and he said and i said i'll put that in a book he said that's good enough i'll put that in a book which i did said profile as the one i would recommend for the final three he said but i won't make any money by selling three tests i make money by selling two hundred tests for that same job and he said in lou i have a jet personal jet that i travel around the world on and you're driving a little whatever it was it was was just you know it wasn't a hot car little a normal price being m w but so he always he passed away unfortunate but he was god
friend but that's what i believe about assessments they're not predictive indicators they're confirming indicators and yes i give it a hundred percent of the time to find a list but i don't give it to um applicants because they meant i don't want to exclude a good candidate when you think hiring as a system the system is i want to hire a great person not want to do an assessment test to screen out week candidates i want to i want to hire the best person so yes it has its place but it has to be at the end of the process at the beginning of the process and that's a fundamental shift that most
r people don't recognize hey yeah i've given it to people for c f o for publicly trading companies i said rich you got remember one guy who is really super senior guy half a million dollar job i said you got to take the silly test that's everybody gets it but so i knew the guy was good and i said just i just take the damn test now the i q test is quite predictive i have always given an i q test but it's still so while it is a useful test that i agree with it i would still give it
lou_adler (16:04.94)
in the sequence of steps it's got to be when the candidate clearly sees this is a job i want and i'm willing to go through the rigmarole of getting it so you got to be careful about the decision from the point of view and whom you want to hire
lou_adler (16:23.42)
well so so let me give you another story about predictive index is a competency based test and it's probably the most well known they've added a n i q component which i totally support but i still think about this so we had a big client and this was in the nineties avery international a big company and it turned out that all our candidates had to take the predictive index personality test um and ninety percent of our candidates pass that test
their candidates only fifty percent pass the test because our focus is on if a person has accomplished a comparable job and an comparable environment successfully how could they not pass the test it's what people do with what they have not what they have that matters not everybody who passes the test can do the work but ninety percent of people who can do the work will pass the test because it's it's pure logic and that really kind of says it's a confirming indicator not a predictive indicator it's now that's certain people so now go back
every now and then you'll find a candidate who doesn't meet the right personality profile even though you've interviewed him based on performance then you got to say well and i remember when canada as very soft spoken for a big director of a cost accounting job implementing a big manufacturing process multi plant and he was very soft spoken i didn't think he would do well in the job but then i started really doing some due diligence and he had worked with the u a w he had worked with it he had worked with finance and worked with manufactr
ing people he was in the financial department and implemented some very complicated cost systems and very difficult manufacturing environments his soft spoken nature allowed him to collaborate with everybody without in general if you get a real hard nosed person and manufac the egos getting away this guy was collaborative work well people like in the union like them so in some cases your mind of what you think is a good person and good personality might not be i by doing that due deli
and with the kind and checking references was the right personality and yet he didn't interview well who's kind of soft spoken you wouldn't have thought well but his results spoke for themselves so you got to be a little bit careful when you do these things that's why i said if the chiefs cam parable results and comparable situations and the personality or something doesn't seem right you got to kind of do your due diligence you don't always have to hire the person but you got to do your due diligence so it offers another series of questions you can ask to insure you're hiring the right person
lou_adler (19:04.56)
yeah
How Bias Sabotages Hiring—and How to Eliminate It with Structure
lou_adler (19:09.08)
okay so let me make the general statement is bias is the number one cause of hiring mistakes we tend to like people in their first impression and when we like somebody we just relax and we start selling the person on the job we stop listening and we discount bad answers and we elevate good answers or ignore wrong answers we do all that stuff when we don't like somebody we go out of our way to insure the person answers that protesans correctly so it's almost self ordained whom you're going to hire based on first impressions and it's all wrong
totally wrong so what i do to minimize bias and it happened i say accidentally in my first search assignment it was for a plant manager in the automotive industry first search assignment nineteen seventy eight hiring manager gave me a list of skills experience and competencies and academics in this case it was handwritten happened to know the co because he was some one i had worked with in the past and remember i gave six months notice so i kind of knowing i was going to become a recruiter right kind of
i had a number of assignments ready to go once they started but i looked at this job description skills experience and competence and i said mike that's not a job description that's a person description what do you want the person to do to be successful and we again we walked around the plant we found five or six things to turn it around inventory issues process doesn't matter what those stuff stuff and i found a person who could do that work so defining a job is a series of performance of jectives which i call a performance base job description is the beginning of stopping bias and the only dis
ion you make is is this person competent to motivated to do that work in my environment now that's what you have to prove so i tend to say i think it's better if you have a phone screen before you bring the canada inside just to get to know each other and ask the kind of he or she s accomplished things like that so then when you do meet the person number on the phone kind of minimize it but the candidate and it's kind of a scripted phone screen if you've got those oments kind of i don't like the person and not hard to but it looks like the person is pretty good so you're
focused on their performance not their personality and that's really the key is has this person accomplished work needed to be done obviously the decision kenthis person fit with my organization is a critical opponent but obvious say as that at the end at the end of the interview i ask yourself is this kennedy's first impression going to help or hinder that person's on the job performance but ask it at the end of the interview when he's person's gone not being biased by it that's hard but we have a scripted interview that goes through that how do you put biased in the parking lot and right
Sherlock Holmes Interviewing: Proving Team Skills Without Guesswork
lou_adler (21:38.82)
but one of my first presentations ever first presentations ever was to a business group where the president of in and out burger was there now if your family with him now burgher and where do you live
okay well in and out burger is a big burger chain on the west coast uh okay at the time they only had sixty stores no ot three hundred i mean goin world right now but i knew them when they had sixty stores and i just said this business group the biggest way to control bias is don't make a decision for thirty minutes bite your tongue bleed asked these questions for thirty minutes and it was just some basic work history review and biggest accomplishment he calls me up a week or two later i says
i love that you want to do it c f o search he unfortunately the president that a burgher at that tient got passed away in an airplane crash and i was my biggest client at the time so i cried for a month but he was just a great guy that is also my biggest client but that was not was the personal issue that i was said in by so the point being is s bias is critical you do have to control it starts by looking at objective criteria that defines on the job performance throw personality
until the end after your interview you can say can this person do this work given the situation and many times you'll discover that people who have a great extraverted friendly personality start digging into their accomplishments they're superficial on the other hand you find some little bit quiet a little bit these they introverted might not might not be they just kill everybody gets nervous in an interview it's important and at the end of the interview discover persons actually better than they are and this
the thing i found a third of the people get worse you thought they're great now than at that great and a third of the people get better you i got to hire them but they get better and a third oth people stay the same so ou just got to put it in the park and lot and it's hard of all the things i train it's hard to do but it's critical to do but if you build a performance pace job description to finding the work with a serious performance objectives and wait thirty minutes using a scripted interview you got a chance to eliminate bias there's other ways to it you started
lou_adler (24:08.62)
well an i think that's all superficial i am i can't judge if i like you are not in the thirty forty minutes you're not the same but i can judge and if you look at proxies for culture intensity of the organization pased to the organization how decisions are made all kind of give you a sense of your culture so when i do cultural fit that's a critical issue it want to minimize it but looking at the person making a personal judgment that's not how you do it you got to be a little bit more
discipline and scientific so so i say hey jeff you know we had a pretty intense organization to walk through the biggest accomplishment you had where you really had to deal under pressure nd i want to understand how you dealt with it so that's one way to do it is to map your organizations culture and see if that person has accomplishment and has been successful in that kind of comparable organization i mean that's really the issue but from a team standpoint i remember this is probably eight or ten years ago a twenty three year old kid brilliant young man he was in london
over there he said lo i got this guy for a thirty five real old guy i was sixty five at the time and i don't know if he's a jerk or not and i don't know this kid is twenty two and he looks sixteen so i said calamy said here's the way you determined team skills just ask him about the teams he's been on what's the biggest team you've managed how do you get on that team who else was on the team what happened as a result after that team and if you look at the progression of a person's team growth and skills and collaboration over
you'll know if they have good team skills persons flat and has never worked with anybody else before year after year in different companies don't hire because there's a clue that they don't have good team skills but on the other hand if you have somebody on the team ask this person to we'd like you to be on this team to lead this effort and then at that effort another group says he we want jeff on this team and that team you got whether you like the person or not that person has got good team skills and this i call it the sherlock holmes evidence based interview you don't have to make the personal decision yourself other people already made that decision so look for that evidence there
interview have other people treated this person for team skills and all of a sudden you'll know an you won't be shocked when they come out persons just like they thought they would but if you make a personal decision it's unlikely you're going to be right
Hire for Grit, Not Glamour: Why Overachievers Beat Naturals
lou_adler (27:49.2)
i think it's it's different hiring someone who's right out of school different hiring someone right out of school so uh in general i i am a cynic i don't trust anything i don't trust any generic statistical validation so i just now the reason is because i give one year guarantee and i gave i was the first contingency for him in the world to give one year guarantee i don't want to do on an o ive the money back or do it over again that's a waste of time so i take it very religiously if the person has accomplished stuff comparable to what you need
and consistently over time and ere comparable i'm saying i'd give that person a shock if that person has learned quickly and thrown in over the head and survived i'd give that person a shock but i wouldn't give a test of that i want to see specific evidence of that thing i'm not sure that athletics is the great example of that maybe it is if you got someone who sit on the bench and then was thrown in and work real hard to even sit on the bench then
and maybe that that's where i would demonstrate grip not somebody's naturally gifted not somebody who's naturally got a great personality those people get it easy it's people who have aren't the best athletes that still achieve success that don't have the best personality that still achieve success that became the leaders despite their flaws i would probably give that person more credit than someone who has got all the gifts and somehow leverage of those gifts that thought to me that the person with the gifts isn't good so i don't want to say that but i would just be concern
and that wouldn't give me the confidence that i could give a person a one year guarantee that's what i call in when hiring win when hiring hire for the anniversary date not to start meaning a year from that and i look good and the canada still says i want to be had this job that's hard to do on both sides so but it's but i'm a cynic and again i'm an engineer i mean you mentioned that briefly i don't trust anything this thing's got to work so i'm a bit of a cynic and so i see all these things and i've been kicked out of a lot of h r com
i i don't want to deny that because i see the world differently i see hey you know this is a serious decision on both sides and there are ways to do it right but when you use statistical measures to do it right and assessment test i don't i think you're missing a forest for the trees but that's my opinion
The One Question Every Employer Must Ask Before Making an Offer
lou_adler (30:21.8)
well jeff let me ask you this if we could put a nice offer package together would at least be interested getting serious about it to test jeff how would you how would you know how would you compare our job to other things you're now considering is it one two or three jeff on a scale of one to tend how would you rank our job in comparison to everything else you're looking at what would it take to be number one on your list so all of a sudden i'm uncovering what it would take jeff now and then if you re making of jeff we're thinking of making you an offer
talked about that we've already forget the money forget the money do you want the job remember we talked about the criteria that drives on the job success the work itself do you really want to do this work our gonta work with this team you want to work at our company you like the work life balance is just as satisfying to tell me about why you want this job at fran for for the money and jeff i'm going to tell you we're not going to make you the offer if you don't if this isn't clear to you but i told you two weeks ago when we started this journey that if we made you an offer we're gon
talk about all these other factors other than the money so you is this a job you really want of rent from tell me why and how it compares to other things you're looking at all of those are tests hey jeff if we could put an offer together by the end of the week when could you give us when could you give us your notice when do you think it could start so right there i said so if i say jeff you know we've been talking this is the second round of interviews and we could put a real nice offer package together when do you think it could start and if you can't give me a specific date you don't want this job it's all about the money because if you do want the job after two meeting
i know you've thought about when you could start but i got to think about it we screwed up so that's what testing is all about it's just like in closing are you serious about this how would you compare uncovering all those issues because oftentimes at these miners i didn't know about the insurance plan i can't get my kids on the insurance men for your under twenty days and i can't take that job i mean it's so i lost i mean literal there's not one thing in that book or the thing i talk about that didn't cost me
money i make six even eight hundred placement or deal with other people working place over a thousand search assignments you make a lot of screw ups but and you hopefully you avoid them the next time so that's what really it is as you make mistakes and if you follow the rules you'll make fewer mistakes you'll still make them but you'll make fewer ones and you make better hiring decisions
lou_adler (32:51.92)
yeah yeah absolutely
lou_adler (33:04.14)
but then the real question f though is ask what would it take to be number one on your list whatever number add a number to that and say what because they'll ell you all why they don't like it
lou_adler (33:18.34)
you're on home and make another offer to somebody right
lou_adler (33:35.26)
well i don't know that that's what it said it said sometimes great hires or great candidates aren't great hires so that's and the reason is if i ask hiring managers and we've given training to thousands of hiring managers for forty thirty forty years it's not hard to do that man when you've been here at so many years but i said what's a great hire gets results work with a team fits the culture reliable has all these personal attributes that you want that's what that's what a great hire they achieve results in your situation then i say
what's a great candidate's got to have ten years of this skills like this these competencies those aren't predictive the skills you want also screen out people because the a lot of people who have those skills a different mix of skills can still do the job but then we interview candidates based on they have a good have those skills they agree with to go forward and do they make a good interview presentation well that's a great candidate but that doesn't mean that canada would be a great higher sometimes you have people a little bit nervous who aren't great candidates sometimes you have candidates who have a differ
mix of skills and experiences so you now excluded people could do become a great higher because you've defined the selection criteria improperly so that's really what i said great candidates often don't make great hiers because you've screened some of the best people out to have a different mix of skills and experiences and who aren't necessarily the best interviewers in the world interviewing isn't a predictive sign i mean it's right there we've talked about bias first impression determined and how many people interview properly very few that's why i
when i deal with it no i'm gonna be there when you're in your interview i'm goin to show you how to interview properly but i truly do it from a business stamp and i don't want to do this search over again and i don't want to find extra candidates when i know these ones are good so that's my cynical approach to it
lou_adler (36:12.54)
so you're talking about finding them or interviewing them
The Franchisee Fit Test: How to Hire for Early-Stage Entrepreneurship
lou_adler (36:19.7)
well let's just say interviewing fining them heard i'd probably want to do that through referral basis but interviewing them so so let me kind of go two ways i would ask the that franchise owners define the work as a series of performance objectives what do you want this person to accomplish after the first year you're gonna have twenty new accounts you're gonna build a team of two or three sales reps whatever it is you define the work as a secret of steps and clearly performance objective then interview have you ever done
complished anything like that so go through the questioning how what have you accomplishes most related how then you asked the other question the problem solving question is how would you do this given our set of circumstances and i want good clear answers but just as important is can this person handle three to six months or ten months or twelve months before there's a lot of income coming through i brought a lot of recruiters on board who had all the capacity to do it but it does take three to six months to ramp up before they're making
money and if they didn't have money and the support of their family and wife or whatever it was they were going to fail and most of them were competent could do it but they realized the money pressure became the issues why they had to leave so that was the other thing i always looked at when we brought in a recruiter who came from corporate did that person have enough money to handle it for six months or a year making a low income if they got to year they could go through year one by year two they were making pretty good money but the first year was pretty lean so i think it's kind of a similar
mind set there is they've got to be competent and motivated to do it then they have to have the financial resources to do it as the family support to do it without the family support and financial they're going to fail
now it's my good response without thinking about it jeff
lou_adler (41:41.18)
well there's two phases to that question given three minutes over a view of your process i can't determine if it's any good or not so let me just take that off the table so that i don't know can our process help in some way in a process that you implement there's absolutely no question about we helped other people en franchises to pull that off um but if i just had to give you the glib response again based on what you said
and how many franchises do you have jeff just total number ten fifty hundred five hundred okay so here's what i would say now this is the engineer behind me i would want to meet the best ones you've got and say okay what do they do that made them the best then i'm going to try to say okay can i duplicate that in finding other people like that rather than start from scratch i don't know if this starting from scratch and that whole thing works i don't know you've seen enough
people so i can't and that's why i said but i at once i understand okay let me understand what it takes to be successful and why have these people been successful that gives me a starting point i said okay now what is the methodology in which i could find people and bring them through and design the process so i would not design the process until i figured out what it took to be successful and why those people are successful then i define a process to find those people and make sure that i get the best ones
in the process so to me the process is the last thing you do you got to figure out what's the strategy or the lot of these people where do you find him you get through furls can you write a job posting these recruiters i mean is a whole host of ways to find them but i don't know what success looks like so i can't answer that your process is the right process so sorry for that political response that said no i can't answer it
lou_adler (43:43.72)
uh no i say the issue that i say to people is that hiring should be a long term decision too many folk people focus on what getting that person started on day one and all this criteria what's the comp what's this what's that but the real truth is people are successful based on intrinsic motivators do they really want to do that work is the circumstances is a long term so again that goes back to your question so i think if you're going to make a lot of so this as i said to the candidate many years ago i stayed all the ti
don't make long term career decisions using short term data understand the job itself what the challenges are and hire people motivating compend to do it and if you're candidate say is this a job i want for the long term not for the start date package because if you want it for the start date package the probability is low that it's going to be successful so that's why i say think long term don't make strategic decisions using tactical information
lou_adler (44:48.9)
no i think it's that term higher n when higher higher for the anniversary date not to start date and i think that's the one i would say it's most important too many people focus when they changed changing jobs important decision for the candidate more important than the candy than a company maybe not your but in general company screws up they'll survive canada screws up that's not it's a damaging thing so they got to think long term not short term and i told the candy many years ago don't make long term decisions using short term data
he was trying to counter him to take an offer that i presented and he decided not to take it but then he ultimately did take an offer from my client and thank me because the short term to comp wasn't enough the title wasn't good enough but a year later it was clearly superior so i think that's the hard part is getting the information a long term career decisions too important to leave the chance
lou_adler (45:50.02)
well i think well i'm kind of semi retired so reach out if you want but i probably not gonna do much and i say that semi superficially but it's kind of true but i have a wait wait wait wait wait i have a book called higher with your head if you go to high with your head dot com and i can see behind your back i don't see my book on your bookcase jeff which come on you might want to re modify that you know well you kind of put it up there i see that is it well go to hire your head dot com
and join our book club we meet once every four to six weeks and we discuss different topics in the book club you don't have to buy the book to join but you can join that's the best way to connect with my company high with your head dot com join the book club and be part of understanding what it takes to make great career decisions whatever side of the desk were
lou_adler (47:11.4)
thank you very much everybody thank you jeff
jeff_dudan (47:48.385)
start your next chapter of greatness and build your dynasty on the home front i will be looking for you and today i am extremely excited to have low adler on the phone with us today and low is the co and founder of the adler group consulting and training from helping companies implement win win hiring programs using his performance based hiring system for finding and hiring exceptional talent more than forty thousand recruiters and hiring managers that's forty thousand
have attended his ground breaking workshops over the past thirty years lose the author of the amazon top ten best seller hire with your head and the essential guide for hiring and getting hired louis been featured on fox news and his articles and posts can be found on ink magazine business inside of bloomburgh in the wall street journal welcome lu adler to on the home front today
jeff_dudan (48:43.285)
oh it's going to be it's going to be great i've spent so much time going through your stuff and hiring and recruiting is a particular passion for mine built businesses over the last thirty years and it's you know i think jim collins talks about who luck right if you get the right people in the right seat you seem to get lucky and good things seem to happen when you have the wrong people in the wrong seats then things go a little bit slower or not at all so i'd love to start with the your background lou anything you'd care to share i know that you
you're from new york originally you live in california today went to clark's and got an engineering degree and then your ba from u c l a what would you care to share about your journey early days growing up
jeff_dudan (51:08.505)
thinking back to that inflection point you're gainfully employed you're highly degreeed you're having success in your career and then you decide to become an entrepreneur and start the adler group how were you were you forced into that decision or was that something were you fearful about it was it something you had been planning or you know when you have to
jeff_dudan (53:44.385)
yeah there's no shortage of people that would want you to make money for them for sure and yeah you know i look back i have three or four inflection points that i talk about in my journey and building a national brand and then selling it and now creating a couple of national platforms but usually these inflection points they have people people that you care about wife and your son they have an adventure and an opportunity and then they've got some risk of loss and yeah i've found in my life that you always have to give up at least something to try to get
something greater so i always interested in in people's journey from that so well that's great so let's talk a little bit about and i think for the benefit of our audience in particular i know that hiring and recruiting particularly when you got a tight job market is absolutely imperative most people do it they bring people in they have an interview and then if they like him they don't they don't not particularly scientific about it and if they if they like them and if
seem to have done something similar in the past often times unsophisticated companies they're going to get the job there and it is that is a travesty a lot of times the way that that ultimate shakes out we've used a lot of competency based interviewing and i know that you use you know your system as a performance based system so i'd really like to unpack it a little bit and in thinking about maybe some people some franchise ores or p
that are looking at becoming entrepreneurs and becoming franchises you know how are they going to get those first key people and they're gonna impact their business so one of the things that i don't know maybe you could just do a little bit of a overview about performance based hiring and how we need to think about it
jeff_dudan (55:36.225)
uh uh
jeff_dudan (58:20.225)
uh h
uh
jeff_dudan (59:32.825)
oh
jeff_dudan (01:00:15.665)
uh
jeff_dudan (01:00:37.045)
yeah i'll tell you and that probably avoids a lot of project and long ramps and a lot of training that you've got to do just to see if the person can perform in the role get somebody that can perform from day one so are you a big fan of assessments pre employment assessments are there any that you recommend or you know are they valuable
jeff_dudan (01:01:03.365)
yes
jeff_dudan (01:01:28.245)
good deal
jeff_dudan (01:03:33.505)
it so how heavily though would the hiring decision be weighted upon the results of those tests for the final three candidates is it
jeff_dudan (01:03:44.505)
yeah
jeff_dudan (01:03:53.225)
uh
jeff_dudan (01:06:11.265)
got it that's that's great biases what are the what are the types of biases that generally come into the hiring process and what can you do to minimize those as best as possible
jeff_dudan (01:06:32.305)
yes
jeff_dudan (01:07:37.225)
m
jeff_dudan (01:08:46.925)
yeah
jeff_dudan (01:09:06.665)
yep north carolina
jeff_dudan (01:09:12.105)
oh i've had him i've had him
jeff_dudan (01:10:25.725)
hm
jeff_dudan (01:11:05.745)
but you do yeah so but at the end of the interview though after the performance pace piece did you say that you spend a couple of minutes maybe on cultural fit or other things that would maybe indicate you know how easy going they are how they re they can are they congenial can you get along with them do you do that kind of stuff or do you do just
okay
jeff_dudan (01:11:34.185)
right
jeff_dudan (01:13:38.305)
so we've used something called culture index in the past i'm not sure if you're familiar with it or not as an assessment and it provides you nineteen typical profiles of course and everyone there's there's there's interpretation to it that can get down to the fine detail but one of the things on there is kind of an indication of somebody's battery and i found it to be very accurate so you know the indication is so how long can somebody
perform you know outside of their personality type in the fulfillment of a job and it kind of goes to energy it kind of goes to grit it kind of goes to perseverance do you look at anything like that that says you know okay i'm looking at this i'm looking at the c v and maybe it's a young person n you know they were on the women's nineteen national championship soccer team they won this they got a black belt and something else they you know got a four point and they were on the you know all of these
different things and it looks like this person has the ability to do a lot and accomplish a lot of things to to have competing priorities and be successful within that i mean how much do you look at just share volume of accomplishments or size of accomplishments and kind of assessing mean is it fair to say that that if they've been successful in the past when faced with challenging situations or in competitive environment that they're likely to figure it out here or do you do you do you use that at all
jeff_dudan (01:15:11.345)
sure
jeff_dudan (01:15:18.745)
okay
yeah
jeff_dudan (01:16:13.885)
hm
jeff_dudan (01:16:35.845)
yeah
jeff_dudan (01:16:46.705)
that's what that meant
jeff_dudan (01:17:22.105)
got it i love it help me understand this don't make an offer until your one hundred percent sure it will be accepted i sat and thought about that and i couldn't figure out how to do that because technically if i'm talking to the people and i'm talking about the offer i'm making the offer but what what do you mean by that specifically
jeff_dudan (01:17:45.885)
absolutely absolutely
jeff_dudan (01:18:04.765)
yeah
jeff_dudan (01:19:33.185)
right
jeff_dudan (01:20:01.325)
yeah tell you i'm gonna have o give myself a few points here lou because i ask a lot of those questions that's kind of how i go about it you know those those trial closing questions but you know it's not really even trial closing it's just that that's what makes sense i want to gage hey i always ask at the end of an interview scale i want one to tend how interested are you in this position
jeff_dudan (01:20:26.765)
yeah
jeff_dudan (01:20:31.005)
right right right right well that's good i appreciate that a lot that's right i've got him we got him stacking up in here like cord wood so you know i also saw something that was interesting to me it said sometimes your worst candidates can be your best hires
jeff_dudan (01:21:06.105)
okay
sure
jeff_dudan (01:22:22.165)
yes
jeff_dudan (01:22:35.405)
yeah yeah easiest past the best best placemen so i imagine you sometimes work with startups but probably only startups that are well funded maybe pe backed something like that if if you were going to help somebody or just you know over a cup of coffee advise maybe somebody who's investing in a franchise business they're going to have five to ten employes but their first couple employes are really crit
but these aren't these aren't back businesses these are family people these are corporate refugees these are people that that are really trying to you know really get their first couple of people right what could you you know how would people if they couldn't afford somebody like you what could people do what would be your best advice to to be as good as you possibly could in the hiring process
jeff_dudan (01:23:33.605)
well i guess it would be interviewing them and placing them
okay okay
okay
jeff_dudan (01:24:29.905)
hm
jeff_dudan (01:24:38.165)
sure
jeff_dudan (01:25:18.085)
great great well lo
well i appreciate that that's a great response so i guess i'll just kind of open it up i mean you know so so let me describe to you really quickly are candidate process so again we're a franchise or and we get our candidates from a variety of sources there's consultant groups in our industry who who reach out to candidates who are maybe out of a job or looking for a new opportunity sometimes the candidates raise their hands sometimes these consultants reach out and tap the candidates on the
shoulder and ask them you know say hey i'll advise you on on your career and maybe so they'll give them a personality assessment they'll do and income and needs analysis they'll they'll ask them a series of questions about what they like to do maybe a performance of competency based what have they done in the past what do they like to do and then they'll introduce them to four or five different franchise opportunities and if there's a placement they'll extract a fee from the franchise or for the pleasure so it's kind of a recruiting thing as well and then on the oth
side of the house we've got the internet and comprehensive you know websites and landing pages and advertisements and the like to attract candidates to it but generally regardless of the source of the lead we execute about an eight week process about a sixty six day process on average and it starts with education education well it starts with an application from them so first of all we want to do a high level application to make sure that they're qualified
the opportunity financially maybe you know credit criminal would just need to look at what the you know what are the basics and it looks like they're satisfied but you also you don't want to create too high high of a hurdle early because you want to get into conversation with these people and then of course there's education about franchising education about the industry we're talking about education about the company home front brands and then and then really down into the business and and over time you know there's a series of hurdles that they go through
jeff_dudan (01:27:23.185)
financial qualification doing a pro forma legal document review talking to other franchises there's all these it's a very structured process that they go through that culminates with a meet the team or confirmation day where they fly in and with a bunch of other candidates and then after that it's they kind of have to make a decision it's a sales process and we want great candidates and
but we've got sales people right and they want to they want to play steals and but it's really important down the road for the quality of the brand that we get the candidates their absolutely the best fit and going to do a good job with the brands and and all of that so i've tried to incorporate different assessments at different points in the process over the years but you know at the end of the day are you really going to eliminate somebody before you get face to face with them you know it's very hard to determine in an on
pen setting how hard people are going to work what their heart is what their needs are you know how bad do they want it do they want it as bad as they can breathe or they willing to do the work or you know is it is an itch they scratched and they scratch it and they're not doing the work and i can tell you that you can never predict which candidates are going o be great it or i guess my question i have found that we have not been able to predict which candidates are going to be great for a variety of reasons but do you think in the proces
that i described that your methods could help us select better candidates
jeff_dudan (01:29:06.305)
yes
jeff_dudan (01:29:10.805)
okay
jeff_dudan (01:29:33.625)
couple hunt couple couple of hundred right now eh
jeff_dudan (01:29:44.505)
right
jeff_dudan (01:30:47.885)
got it
jeff_dudan (01:30:52.685)
got it well no worries lou is there anything that i should have asked you that i haven't or anything you'd care to share with the audience before we head towards wrapping up
jeff_dudan (01:31:55.025)
that is a that is a mouthful of truth and i really appreciate it lou you've been incredibly successful if you had one sentence to make an impact in someone's life someone's journey what would you offer them
jeff_dudan (01:32:57.865)
that's great luke thank thank you for sharing that with us today and so how can people reach out to you if they are interested in talking to you about your services
jeff_dudan (01:33:15.385)
yeah
okay well they can buy a book or two
jeff_dudan (01:33:23.825)
yeah
jeff_dudan (01:33:36.825)
look at all those yep
jeff_dudan (01:33:55.185)
greatly well this has been brilliant and we're very honored that you took the time with us here today i'm sure you've helped a lot of people you certainly helped me re think some of the things that we're doing in our hiring process so really appreciate being on and as always this podcast broad to you by home front brands simply building the world's most responsible franchise platform so reach out to us reach out to lou or go to home front branch dot com get connected with me through linked in or on instagram
and we will both be looking for you thank you very much
jeff_dudan (01:34:31.225)
okay lu take care right
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.






