Brigadier General Anthony Tata | On The Homefront

Brief Summary
In this powerful and timely episode of On The Homefront, Jeff Dudan sits down with retired Brigadier General Tony Tata to unpack the escalating conflict in Israel and Gaza from a military and geopolitical lens. Drawing from decades of defense strategy and firsthand experience in the region, Tata breaks down Iran’s role, the intelligence failures, the humanitarian toll, and what the U.S. should be doing differently. This is a masterclass in national security, foreign policy, and leadership in the face of complex global crises.
Key Takeaways
- Iran is the disease, Hamas is the symptom: Tata explains how Iran funds, trains, and directs multiple terror proxies across the Middle East, including Hamas and Hezbollah.
- The Abraham Accords threatened Iran’s dominance: October 7th’s attack was a calculated effort to disrupt growing normalization between Israel and Arab states.
- There was a critical intelligence failure: Relaxed sanctions and softened policies led to gaps in U.S.–Israeli intel sharing.
- Civilian casualties are weaponized by extremists: Hamas uses hospitals, schools, and civilians to slow operations and gain international sympathy.
- Tunnel warfare changes everything: Sophisticated underground networks in Gaza complicate combat and humanitarian efforts.
- U.S. policy must refocus on deterrence: Tata advocates for economic strength, energy independence, and a stronger posture against Iran.
Featured Quote
“Iran is the disease. Everything else is a symptom.”
— Brigadier General (Ret.) Tony Tata
TRANSCRIPT
Setting the Stage: Why Israel’s Geography Makes It Perpetually Vulnerable
Jeff Dudan (00:03.386)
Welcome everyone to the home front this morning. We have retired Brigadier General Tony Tata, US Army on with us today. Welcome Tony.
Tony (00:13.871)
with your job. Thank you.
Jeff Dudan (00:16.99)
Tony, the reason that I asked you to come on this morning was to talk about the situation in Israel and the Gaza Strip from an educational perspective. Myself and many others, as this has escalated, has gone to the internet and spent a lot of time researching the region and...
the actions and reactions that are happening. And I really wanted to get your perspective as somebody who's traveled the world and has spent a lot of time in this area in diplomacy and try to get an understanding of, or maybe raise our understanding of what's going on over there right now. I'd like to start from a macro perspective if you would speak to the geopolitical
situation, what challenges does the geography that exists create, and maybe set the scene for deeper conversation around some specific issues.
Tony (01:28.35)
Yeah, great. Thanks, Jeff, for the opportunity. The state of Israel, and there are a lot of debates about when it came into existence, how long Jewish people have been there. Yeah, we're getting ready to celebrate the birth of Christ, a Jew from 2000 plus years ago. So.
put all of that aside because that's something that academics and internet warriors will come up with different facts or make up different facts to argue whose land that is. It is somewhat of a territorial dispute, but let's just take the situation as it is today. The state of Israel is a piece of land
They've got Lebanon in the north. They've got in the northeast Syria. That press along what's called the Golan Heights.
You've got Jordan in the east and you have Egypt in the southwest. And inside Israel, you've got the Gaza Strip to the south that borders between the southern reaches of Israel and Egypt, the western or eastern portions of Egypt. And then you've got the West Bank, which is inside Israel.
Jerusalem where the embassy was moved to. So you have the Jewish people
Tony (03:09.29)
and Israel was really established as a safe place, a safe state for the Jewish people post-World War II. And the Arabs around, some are very moderate and get along great with Israel, and some are not so moderate, and want to eradicate Israel and the people
there. A lot of this is fomented, Jeff, by Iran. Iran has habitually exported since the early 80s after the fall of the Shah and the rise of the theocracy there. The terrorist groups throughout
Yemen, the Houthi rebels way down on the south part of the Arabian Peninsula, the Shia militia groups in Iraq that continuously attack U.S. bases and forces situated in Iraq and Syria. And then you have Hespelah in the north of Israel in Lebanon. And then you have Hamas, who is sort of the primary antagonist right now, all funded.
by Iran and as terrorist proxies for carrying out their own ends, ways, and means for Iranian foreign policy. And so that's sort of the setting the table for what's happening today. On October 7th, Hamas conducted a surprise attack.
into Israel and really murdered, slaughtered, you know, innocent Jewish people at a concert in their homes and conducted atrocities that are not consistent with the Geneva Conventions, which is an important distinction because they're
October 7th: The Goal Line Break and What It Means
Tony (05:23.522)
People try to make a moral equivalency between what Hamas has done and what Israel's doing. And Israel, I've been there, I've been to the Golan, I've been down to the border with Gaza, I've been to Jerusalem, I've laid a wreath in the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem with the Israeli Defense Forces. So I understand the culture of the people, the threats that they face.
Tony (05:53.956)
is an existential threat for the Israeli people and adhering to the Geneva conventions and adhering to minimization of civilian casualties is paramount in everything that I've seen the Israeli Defense Forces do as I've
operated with them. And so I say all of that to provide the larger context. They are surrounded. They have a constant threat. And Iran is funding all of these different groups. And essentially what you have is someone that's, you know, if a football team is on your one yard line,
every play and you have to have a goal line stand, that's essential to use a football analogy. That's essentially what Israel is having to do is prevent that touchdown and on October 7th the defense didn't hold up on that goal line stand to use that metaphor.
Jeff Dudan (07:03.634)
So this is an ongoing conflict using many proxies. And when you research this, you realize that there's always attacks and counterattacks. There's always anti-terrorism operations going on. There's people getting killed all the time between all these factions. And what would...
the events of the seventh do, what would be the strategy, in your opinion, around that to escalate this conflict in such a drastic manner?
Tony (07:46.894)
But the why would Iran and Hamas do that or.
Jeff Dudan (07:54.746)
Yes, what was the strategic, you have to, none of these actions happen in a bubble. They might be new to us, but they're not new to the ongoing relations between the countries. They had to understand that this was taking things to a new level, and so you have to assume it was done with intention.
Tony (07:58.758)
Mm-hmm.
Why Iran Chose This Moment: Disrupting the Abraham Accords
Tony (08:14.619)
Yep, yep, yep. Great question.
Jeff Dudan (08:16.166)
and strategy. What would be the strategy behind something like that?
Tony (08:19.894)
Yeah, the strategy is Iran sees the traction that the Abraham Accords were getting and the normalization of relations between Arab nations and the Jewish state Israel.
And for example, UAE and Israel, Bahrain and Israel, Morocco and Israel, others, even Egypt, lots of initiatives and.
The essence of the Abraham Accords, however maligned they get by mainstream media, is that you use economics to bridge centuries of hatred and that are sort of baked into the cultures.
And so a lot of traction there with that. And a lot of, and I was part of that when I served as undersecretary of defense for policy. The Abraham Accords included weapons packages that helped create offsetting balances of power and that kind of thing. And so I spent a lot of time talking to both, for example, UAE
and Israel policy peers within their ministries of defense and making sure that we had this right. And I mentioned that because it was well along the way. It was fully baked in some cases and partially baked in other cases where these economic relations were
Tony (10:10.854)
starting to trickle down and normalize relations between the countries where the more that you can exchange ideas and cultures and you say, well, you know, they're not that bad. They're not that bad.
So Iran can't have that, right, because they're a theocracy and it's in their national interest to drive the United States out of the Middle East and eradicate, eliminate the state of Israel.
And so Iran and the Shia influence, the Shia, you know, Iranians are Shia for the most part. And then most of the rest of the Arabian Peninsula is Sunni and they have a lot of disagreement, but in this case, the Arab world is aligning to
support one another and at least with information and statements and diplomacy to try to have the back of the Palestinian people. And so the overall strategic goal of Iran, who calls all these shots from a terror exportation standpoint,
is to disrupt the momentum of the Abraham Accords and the normalization of relations with Israel by other...
Tony (11:51.698)
Arab states and to continue to foment distrust and discontent in the region so that they, Iran, can continue to expand its hegemony in the Arabian Peninsula.
Jeff Dudan (12:13.154)
It seems like there are many paths to escalation, maybe first and foremost coming from Lebanon through Hezbollah with their weaponry that they have and their ongoing conflicts that they've had with Israel and Golan and the other areas.
The Real Escalation Threats: Hezbollah, Syria, and Proxy Traps
Jeff Dudan (12:42.494)
What do you see as the greatest opportunity for this conflict to escalate to a much broader situation?
Tony (12:55.74)
Yeah, you know, about two, three weeks ago, he had Hespelaw in the north, with, you know, the leader was getting ready to make a big statement. He made a big statement and everybody was concerned that Hespelaw was gonna come in and attack from the north and Syria was gonna attack from the northeast. And, you know, the...
you know, hearken back to the, you know, the mid-70s when you had major tank battles and, you know, where Israel was having to defend from interior lines in the north and the south and so forth. That was a concern. I didn't see that and I was pretty consistent on whether I was on...
It didn't matter what cable news show I was on. I said, I believe that Hespehla is a fixing operation and fixes a military term to make you Israel have forces in the North.
so that you can't reinforce in the south. So it dilutes your ability to mass on the real threat, which was Hamas in the south. And so they did probing. They've exchanged artillery and all that. That's classic, faint fixing operation to use military terms.
Syria, I don't think ever really seriously ginned anything up. The real threat for escalation, and it's a coin toss, depending on who you talk to, there is reticence in the administration today to confront Iran in a major way.
Funding the Enemy: How U.S. Policy Empowered Iran
Tony (14:45.866)
And we've talked for, you know, the last few minutes about how Iran is fomenting all this discontent, not only fomenting, funding and supplying weapons and also the rhetoric that goes with it. And so, do you treat the symptoms?
which is Hamas and Hespelah and Houthis, or do you treat the disease, which is the theocracy in Iran? And I think from a policy perspective, if I were in my old job advising the president, certainly one of the options to be laid on the table for the president to look at would be an option that takes on in a non-boots on the ground
way Iran and attempting to dismantle some of their oil infrastructure, reimpose very strict sanctions because remember the administration lifted the sanctions on Iran. They are now selling billions of dollars of oil to China.
Jeff Dudan (15:58.782)
That's right.
Tony (16:04.614)
and a lot of that money, they unfroze assets to go to Iran. And even though that's supposedly earmarked for humanitarian aid, it's fungible, right? If I know somebody's gonna be paying my mortgage, then I can take that 10,000, 5,000 or whatever it is and use it for other things, right?
Jeff Dudan (16:31.55)
Tony, are those policy decisions that you just mentioned connected directly to what we're seeing happen today?
Tony (16:40.33)
Yeah, I think so. I think the policy decision to eliminate the sanctions on Iran, or not enforce them is probably a better way to put it, to unfreeze Iranian assets in exchange for some hostages that Iran had, to take the Houthis off the terrorist list.
All of these things are done in an attempt to appease Iran, but we don't get anything back from Iran, right? I mean, there's no... What we get is they were training the Hamas operatives in Iran, teaching them how to do the parachuting in and the...
the tactics and they rehearsed the October 7th event in Iran. And so this laissez-faire approach, it's very different than the maximum pressure campaign that was in the previous administration that was having some effect on their ability to
export terror throughout the region. And so that policy makes a difference. And so what we're seeing today is a result of a more funded Iran, a more emboldened Iran. And frankly, one of the things that concerns me is the intelligence failure that happened here.
There was an intelligence failure from the US standpoint and in Ukraine also, and then there was an intelligence failure obviously in Afghanistan and so When I when I think about you know the border US border is that the fourth intelligence failure that we're gonna we're gonna find out about and so You know obviously these national security is best done in a proactive way
Four Intelligence Failures: Afghanistan, Ukraine, October 7th... and What’s Next?
Tony (18:57.954)
figuring things out ahead of time, predicting what's happening, having policies that attempt to shape it so that you have less opportunity for those that want to harm us to harm us. So that's, I'm really concerned about that. What's that fourth intelligence failure that's out there right now?
Jeff Dudan (19:24.83)
Well, simply put, once somebody shows you who they truly are, believe them. And the core of the ideology in Iran was not going to change, regardless of us loosening, you know, unfreezing assets or loosening restrictions on them. And so we, maybe we've got what we, we've got what we bought right now.
Tony (19:52.653)
Right.
Jeff Dudan (19:52.97)
And with respect to the border, I've talked to more than one person in, you know, in circles. And there's a big concern that we've probably let in some people that maybe we shouldn't have kind of nestled in with.
with everybody else that's coming in with the loosened restrictions and what not, which is a concern domestically for our security.
Tony (20:27.678)
Yeah, absolutely. They, you know, any government's job is to first and foremost protect their people and their property. So talking about Israel, you know, Netanyahu's job.
is to create a national security, a secure space, a secure terrain for the Jewish people to live. Same thing with this administration. The security of U.S. citizens is job number one of any administration. And the policies of any administration should reinforce
domestic security because you know national security is a domestic issue if people don't feel safe then certainly they can't pursue life liberty and happiness right so consistent with our Constitution so that's that the it's in today's world national security and domestic security are
Jeff Dudan (21:32.062)
Hmm.
How Tunnels, Civilians, and Propaganda Slow the IDF
Tony (21:44.014)
inextricably intertwined and certainly haven't operated around the world. When I was in Afghanistan and we were raiding Al-Qaeda and Taliban hideouts in our intelligence, we assessed that we disrupted two plots to attack the United States. This was pretty early on in the whole.
Afghanistan drive, but to the extent that we can have intelligence assets that are working with other nations so that we can have eyes on, ears on, pictures, etc., imagery, signals, and so forth to build an intelligence picture to continuously assess.
the threat and then take appropriate action within the United States. That's sort of the whole purpose of our intelligence community and our national security community.
Jeff Dudan (22:56.938)
Moving back into the conflict at hand, speaking of intelligence, signal mapping within the region, identifying cell phones of known operators of Hamas, mapping tunnels, apparently.
the majority of the weaponry and the forces are can or are contained underground and are which makes it very difficult to identify movement and also to access by the IDF and then identifying operations basis of operations basis of where they're launching or defending
What role, where were the intelligence failures specifically leading up to the situation? And then what do you believe from an intelligence perspective is important right now?
Tony (24:05.974)
Yeah, so on the failure side, we have, we, the United States, has intelligence sharing agreements, arrangements with Israel. And I'm told that some of those were adjusted, rearranged, not enforced in light of this overall outreach to Iran.
over the last year or two, which would explain either why we weren't watching or if we watched and saw and didn't share. Either one is really bad.
But that would explain sort of the failure aspect. And when you're trying to reach out to Iran, who, as you said, when someone tells you who they are, believe them. If they're shouting, death to America, death to Israel, I'm not sure there's a whole lot of negotiation space there. So.
But in this outreach, one of the things that we found is, and Congress found this out, there were three or four Iranian, some call them spies, some call them sympathizers, but they have top secret clearances and they work in the Department of Defense and Department of State.
And so it's not too hard to draw a line between, for example, the Chief of Staff to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations is...
Tony (26:02.222)
She's a U.S. citizen of Iranian descent but communicates regularly with the Supreme Council in Iran. And these emails were uncovered. Before congressional testimony, she would...
go and make sure that she's saying what the Iranian Supreme Council wants her to say. And it's not a stretch to assume that if she has access to every piece of intel that comes in
particularly with reporting to the number two there, reporting to the special ops assistant secretary, who when I was the under, reported to me, these people weren't there, of course.
It's not a stretch to assume that Intel was just not shared. So you could get a micro look at it like that in a macro sense, the appeasement strategy with Iran, perhaps they just weren't watching. And you know, the worst case speculation is they knew and didn't tell. I would never...
speculate that but it's certainly I've seen people. So that's the failure part. Now what's important now and I've been you know this pause business where Israel you know gets attacked and then all of a sudden you know immediately you have people saying oh don't strike back or as soon as they get some momentum all you need to slow down.
Why Pauses Hurt Military Momentum—and Help Hamas
Tony (27:49.934)
You know, we need to let Israel defend itself, right? If Israel's not safe for the Jewish people, then what's the point, right? And what I know about combat operations is that...
when you have signals intelligence, imagery intelligence, human intelligence, every layer of intelligence that you can possibly have, you can use what time, precious time you have to develop good plans that protect your people and then try to go find the hostages, try to go and...
destroy Hamas who attacked you and that momentum, offensive momentum has a quality all its own that's really hard to capture because as you're pressuring Hamas they have to communicate. They have to say, hey I'm getting attacked over here, oh I'm moving over here, I'm going here.
and they have to move because either that or they die or get overrun or get captured. And so when you have people talking and moving, all your intelligence assets are able to pick up on that and it creates this operations intelligence cycle that gets inside the decision cycle of the enemy, Hamas, and allows you to be more successful.
these pauses do that are being coerced onto Netanyahu and others by people who don't, frankly don't understand what I just said.
Tony (29:43.854)
or perhaps they do and want Hamas to be able to regroup and refit because it's like a pick six in a touchdown or in a football game. You've got all this momentum and then you've got to stop and now they're refitting and your intelligence isn't as good. So that's to use another football analogy. And I do that because you were a football star upstate.
phone.
Jeff Dudan (30:14.042)
Well, so the latency, any latency between an insight garnered by intelligence and a resultant formalized plan and subsequent action reduces the quality or the effectiveness of the intelligence itself.
Tony (30:34.722)
Mm-hmm. That's right. That's right. The, you know, you could apply that to the business world or whatever, but the, now that we're paused, right, and, you know, the pressure on Netanyahu's got to be enormous, right, because these hostages that are being doled out in a barbaric fashion, little kids, children, women.
80 year old, 70 year old women and it gets heralded by the media as if, you know, it's, you know, the benevolent Hamas captures. It's barbaric and but what's happening is that
There, Israel defense forces are hunkered around Gaza City now and continuing internal cleanup operations, right? Kordon and searches. And so the pause to me comes at sort of a natural time in the operational sense of, of comedy of tactics, operations and strategy.
After Gaza City: Why Southern Gaza Must Be Next
Tony (31:56.852)
played it about right. He got Gaza City. He's got it surrounded. There's still a lot of little tactical skirmishes happening inside all of that. He's clearing the tunnels. He's clearing the building. He's got a lot of work to do to make sure that that's 100%. You know, there's no enemy in there and so he can pause now.
and begin and you know I hope and I'm sure that he's planning for the next phase to go to southern Gaza which is you know a different kind of warfare and it's going to be some of us more open land and it's a different kind of fight than the urban fight that he's had. There is some obviously
Tony (32:56.855)
If they're able to get the hostages back, or the great majority of them, and continue to plan, under no circumstances, if I were advising Netanyahu, would I entertain any kind of permanent ceasefire? Because he's got to get to southern Gaza. And Israel, in my view, is a great enemy.
what I know about all of the actors and players here. Israel needs to clean that place out and dominate it, dominate that battle space and then reconstruct it and then figure out some path forward. I don't think the UN is a good arbiter. They have their...
Tony (33:51.366)
They have too many Islamic extremist sympathizers inside the UN that don't like Israel.
borne out by the statements coming from the UN Secretary General and others. And so it would be a good opportunity for NATO out of area mission or some combination of UN, NATO, and even the African Union coming together, some kind of global peacekeeping thing. Because you look at Gaza, it's right there
and much like Beirut, it's been destroyed by this Islamic extremism. And it's unfortunate because the people there, you know, Beirut used to be the banking center of the Middle East, and today it's a hollow shell of itself. And...
Gaza could have been, if all these millions and billions being sent for weapons have been sent for hotels and restaurants and economic development, it would be a resort now. And it's all beachfront property. And
The Value of Hostages in Modern Conflict: It's Calculated
Jeff Dudan (35:07.514)
Oh, it's all beachfront. I mean, it's, yeah.
Tony (35:13.77)
But Iran doesn't want that. They want the hatred, they want the division, they want these people to suffer. Everybody, the Palestinians, they don't care. The Supreme Council there, they don't care. They want people to suffer so that they can continue to foment discontent.
Jeff Dudan (35:40.114)
perspective, what is the value of hostages to Hamas and how do you anticipate them maximizing their leverage in that regard?
Tony (35:56.802)
Yeah, well, I mean, we put a price recently on hostages, about a billion a piece, from a monetary standpoint, with Iran. Six hostages, six billion. And then a few weeks later, after that deal, there was American hostages being held by extension Iran. So it's...
we very clearly define the value, monetary value of hostages. Now these hostages, you know, are fungible just like money is fungible. So one Israeli or one American hostage in Hamas, you know, the barter that's been defined is you will release one
hostage taken not in accordance with Geneva Conventions for three Palestinians that terrorists who were detained in accordance with Geneva Conventions. So that's a pretty outsized gain for the Palestinians, but this is the tough spot that Netanyahu who is in
is that if you've got parents saying that I want my three year old child back, that's being held by Hamas. I mean, how do you how do you say no to that as a leader? And understanding that you have an overarching responsibility to ensure that this never happens again. And so that tension between creating the buffer, defeating Hamas and getting the hostages back.
Jeff Dudan (37:22.886)
No, you can't.
Tony (37:42.818)
is a very small eye of the needle to thread. And I think he's doing it. I think he's doing it well. The value notice that I think there's been one at the time that we're talking, one American, a young little girl released and...
and the other Americans are probably, they're the billion dollar a piece hostages, right? So just the transactional value is three terrorists for one hostage, non-American. And then...
Tony (38:30.554)
one American hostage for a billion dollars. So that seems to be kind of what, you know, if they're looking at a spreadsheet, you know, what they ought to be able to get, which I'm sure they've developed. But it's larger than that too, because there's this, they're able to, they being the Hamas, is able to now dilute the anger.
The longer this goes on, it almost, they almost appear benevolent. Oh, we're going to release 10 more. They could, you know, at any day, release them all and quit firing rockets at Israel. But they choose to, in a very barbaric, sinister way, hold these hostages. And they're not being held just by Hamas.
They're being held by Palestinians. A doctor was holding one, a teacher was holding one. So Israel's not far off when they say that there's not as many innocents as you believe. If these people are holding the hostages, why not just turn them over if you're a doctor and your duty is to first do no harm or if you're a teacher used to dealing
with children, why not on your own accord turn them over? And of course the answer is because they'll be shot and killed by Hamas. So it's a barbaric situation there that we need to learn some lessons from this and I'm concerned that maybe we're not.
NGOs and the Human Toll: Who’s Helping and Who’s Not
Jeff Dudan (40:21.242)
while we're talking about the people, are there NGOs for humanitarian aid that are able to operate in this environment? And if so, who are they and what challenges are they facing?
Tony (40:38.634)
Yeah, so the non-governmental organizations and private volunteer organizations, NGOs, PBOs, they, you know, the Red Cross, of course, is the big one, the UN. There is a heavy slant toward...
the anti-Israel slant in large part toward these NGOs. And when you talk about the aid getting in, that's been part of the mantra here is pause so you can release hostages and pause so that we can get aid in these.
this potpourri of NGOs, non-governmental organizations, to bring in the aid. My question, and what I talk about is when I'm on TV or wherever, is if Iran is able to get rocket launchers and ammunition and...
rations etc to the Hamas fighters, why can't they get the supplies then to the Palestinian people? That's the first thing. The second thing is that the Palestinian people
that are exiting to the south, why don't the neighboring Arab nations, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, take them in? And there's a reason for that, right? I think part of it is they don't want to, they want to keep, those people are fodder.
Tony (42:39.35)
for the larger geopolitical issue of whether or not Israel belongs there, right? They're the cannon fodder for...
the fight that the you know indefinite fight that is you know that is Iran wants to go into infinity. And so they don't want them to leave because they want them to be stuffed right in there and suck it up and suffer whatever consequences that Israel you know has to levy on them after Israel has been attacked. These NGOs that come in there
really see one side of this thing. And it's true, every war-torn area I've been, it doesn't matter who the bad guys are, who the good guys are, however you define that.
you know, women and children and young men and, you know, old men and old women, you know, citizens, they're all human and we lose sight of this human aspect, you know, with all the dehumanization that is going on today from governments and techno-fascism and, you know, politics of personal destruction and the dehumanization effort. We forget. Everybody tends to forget.
that, you know, the young girls that were raped and killed at the concert in southern Israel, they were humans. They had families. The kids, the young Palestinian families, you know, they're humans and they just trying to live a life. And there are...
Tony (44:31.086)
cultures and education indoctrination that goes on, that is detrimental to this larger goal that we should have of, you know, we're all on this planet. None of us are making it out alive and.
you know, we should try to get along because everybody's just a human trying to get along. And these NGOs, some of them are good and that's what they do, and some of them have ill intent. And they end up...
from a social media standpoint, perhaps spreading misinformation. And I want name names, because everybody's, I feel like everybody's trying to find some path forward here with this travesty that's happening.
The Tunnel Warfare Playbook: Lessons from Vietnam to Gaza
Jeff Dudan (45:34.75)
from a tactical perspective, we're talking about people and in Gaza, as you mentioned, these are families with children that have hopes, dreams, they want their children to do well, they want them to be educated, everybody wants the same for their children, we want our children to live a life better than we did, whatever that means, and so the crisis is real on all sides of this for those people.
And one of the analysis that I was watching was talking about really a couple of things that were, that would slow down.
operations. Number one is the people. So asking people to, you know, warning them and saying, we're going to Gaza City, we're going to start in the north, we need everybody to move to the south. And then they then they said, now that we're here, we're going to be moving to the south and everybody needs to move to the sea. And it's, you know, that puts a lot of pressure on the civilians who are trying to get out of harm's way and carry whatever they have on their backs and then move.
to the south and of course there are, there may be forces that are telling them no, you need to stay right where you are because if you're here then that slows things down. And the other thing I'd like you to, you know, comment on from a velocity perspective or a challenge perspective is these tunnels, right? So in, I'm not a historian, but in the South Pacific in World War II, I think we had, we dealt with tunnels. In Vietnam we...
dealt with tunnel warfare, has the ability to, I mean, is it, I don't know, but I'm asking you the standard operating procedures for dealing with tunnel systems, entrenched combatants inside of that, is there anything you can do other than send people down there and have it out in these areas? And I didn't, I mean, the extensiveness of the tunnels, many of them.
Jeff Dudan (47:44.762)
in Gaza are concrete, fortified, reinforced. There's some logistical things like some tracks and wagons and things like that. So it's a very sophisticated and ongoing operation to expand the network of these tunnels and you can move people even from Gaza into Israel in some cases with the tunnels near the border. So how has the...
the dealing with the tunnels and also then the complication of the civilians. How does that slow down operations for the objectives of the IDF?
Tony (48:25.886)
Yeah, you know, Islamic extremists in the last 20 years of combat that we've seen have no issue in Hamas, I would put in that category, using civilians as human shields. It's just, it's part of the game for them. And so you're right when you say, you know, they're not allowed to leave.
because having civilians on the battlefield complicates things immensely for people who don't think the way that these extremists think. And they actually value human life, and they want to preserve human life.
And I know that Israel, I've been in their operations center, they take extreme caution when targeting anything to try to minimize or eliminate civilian casualties. And of course, in combat, that's really, really hard.
So that's the first thing. Now on the tunnels, what I would say is that it's, you know, the issues are related in that if, with the tunnels, if you indiscriminately try to bomb and close the tunnel mouth or
collapse it or whatever. You don't know if they put a bunch of civilians in there or a bunch of hostages in there. And so, and I've been in a couple of tunnels, tunnel mouths in southern Israel that connected to Gaza that they had cemented, they found them. I mean, these things are just like.
Tony (50:19.026)
uh you know holes in the desert and it just you know they pop up and they're very challenging to find uh there are different uh you know i my last assignment in the army i was leading the
counter roadside bomb effort called Joint IED Defeat Organization. And we had about four billion dollars trying to, you know, this was at the peak of our young men and women being attacked by Iranian and mostly improvised explosive devices. Soleimani had created the explosively formed penetrator.
And one of the things that we saw, a couple of things we saw, is that if we had a tunnel or we had a house, they could rig that to explode when an American unit went in there, a four-man squad going into clear house, or you go under a bridge on a road, you collapse it. You know, lots of different things can happen.
And so this Iranian connection, they're experts at these kinds of wicked, destructive, improvised explosive devices. And so as you look at the tunnels, you've really got to approach each one independently and very cautiously. We developed, our private sector developed, we helped fund.
a ground penetrating radar that could find tunnels to some depth and actually see what's in there. So to the extent that, when I was in this job, I was part of my working with the Israeli Defense Forces, I'm hopeful that in the last, you know,
Tony (52:23.438)
12, 15 years, that technology has matured and gotten much better. It was decent back then, and if it's improved, then they're able to either have something low, like a drone, go fly and look for anomalies that find these tunnels, or something high, and that can cover more terrain and find something
ground troops to and then you can assess it and there are ways to look at the tunnel and put some you know we've got robotics that can get in there and cameras and so forth to protect human life you can send you know a bot inside that can then transmit back what they're seeing and then if you're pretty sure
Tony (53:23.312)
you know close both ends of it and be done with it right and move on to the next one um and you know so I don't I think these tunnels were are more logistical networks that uh moved to the hospital uh where they had their command center beneath it or
they move to the elementary school where they have another command center. That this is how fiendish Hamas is. They (Hamas) put all of their command centers beneath the kinds of things that normal human beings would say, you know, please, please don't go near that hospital, elementary school, you know, it's a daycare center, but that's, that's what they use as their, their shield. Right. And so it comes full circle back to the use of civilians on
battlefield with these tunnels.
What the U.S. Should Be Doing Right Now: A Four-Pillar Strategy
Jeff Dudan (54:21.222)
Tony, thank you so much for being on today. This has been an incredible education for all of us on the home front. If you were advising the administration today, you know, what would you have them consider that they might not be considering right now to improve
situation as best as possible.
Tony (54:52.886)
Yeah, great question. I always look at things for really the elements of national power. What national power?
can we bring to bear on the situation that serves our national interest? Because at the end of the day, that's not to be harsh, but that's all that matters, right? US national interests, this administration, any administration's number one job is to serve the American people. And so what best serves the American people? There's a domestic component.
and there's an international component. My advice for what it's worth is to domestically reignite an aggressive energy exploration and permitting process.
so that we can become a net exporter of fossil fuels, while also having the green agenda that, you know, decarbonization and all that, which, you know, is important. And what that does is it reduces, it eliminates a major concern of, it reduces the relevance of the Persian Gulf
to the United States. And that reduces perhaps the number of troops that we need to have over there for actions on the Arabian Peninsula. So that would be the first thing. You know, the rest of the world gets their oil from that area, but if we can be a net exporter, that means that it's not as important to us.
Tony (56:46.038)
The second thing I would say is that Iran is, believe them when they speak, death to America.
They're not benevolent. They will never be benevolent. And so take a different approach with Iran. Show the big stick, you know, that Teddy Roosevelt thing, speak softly, carry a big stick. And compel them to stop this exportation of terror throughout the Middle East. The funding that goes to Hesbullah and Hamas and Houthis
And if they don't, then there should be some punitive action. And we can do that from afar. We can dismantle a...
oil, oil field, oil infrastructure. What is it that Iran cares most about financially? Their oil infrastructure, their nuclear reactors. We can very easily impact those. So I would have a flexible deterrent option as they're called on the table.
that if Iran doesn't, you know, tell Iran, you know, from an information management standpoint, Iran, stop this or we're going to consider something more harsh. And then diplomatically, so diplomacy, information, military, economic. Diplomatically, I would stop this engagement.
Tony (58:25.874)
a meaningless engagement with Iran because it leads nowhere. It leads to October 7th and just get harsh with them. And then from a military standpoint, have the option prepared to be harsher with Iran because they're the disease. Everything else is a symptom. Then economically, I would re-impose very, very strict sanctions and I would enforce those sanctions.
so that they can't send the amount of oil they're sending to China. One of the second-order impacts of all of what's happened over the last three years is that Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea have coalesced and become much closer from a cooperation standpoint because they see us as a common enemy that is not...
acting in our own nation's best interests. And so their opportunity for hegemony, for territorial aggrandizement, Ukraine, Israel, Afghanistan, all of that, they see as an opportunity. And so I would recommend flexing a little muscle and shoring it up through diplomatic information and economic means.
Jeff Dudan (59:52.111)
They have certainly taken advantage of our lack of focus.
Tony (59:56.51)
Yeah, no question about that.
Jeff Dudan (01:00:00.178)
Tony, thank you for your service and thank you for sharing your wisdom with us today on the home front.
Tony (01:00:07.218)
Always my privilege to talk to you, Jeff, and the Homefront Brands team.
Jeff Dudan (01:00:11.602)
All right, take care. Thank you, sir.
Tony (01:00:13.879)
Thank you.
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.




